Diagnose a fabric
"Look at spine-1, spine-2 and leaf-1 and tell me why OSPF is not
forming."
The agent reads LLDP, interface state, neighbor tables and logs across all three, then tells
you which layer failed and what to change. From live state, not from a screenshot somebody
pasted into a chat.
Docs in the loop
"What does this NX-OS log line mean, and is it affecting my vPC?"
Your client searches the vendor documentation on the web while reading your live device, so
the answer is written against your actual output instead of a generic example.
Ask a whole group
"Which access switches have interface errors climbing?"
Share a site or a tier and ask across it: compare NTP and logging settings across the campus
core, or find which devices still run the old image. One read, run on every device you
shared, returned as a diff.
Verify a change window
"Read this before and after, and hand me the diff."
Capture state before the window and again after, and let the agent tell you what moved.
Nobody has to paste terminal output into a chat box to get a second opinion.
Design review against reality
"Check my design notes against what these devices actually run."
Bring the document you wrote and let the agent compare it to live VLANs, uplinks and routing
adjacencies, then flag the gaps. The drift you find this way is the drift you were going to
find at 2 a.m. otherwise.
Onboarding and handover
"Explain this site to me. I have never worked on it."
A new engineer gets the explanation from live state plus RTRGRD's vendor knowledge, and every
claim traces back to a read they can go and look at themselves.
Your own automation
An agent you built on Claude Code or Codex, pointed at the fleet.
Your automation gets a deterministic, logged, read-oriented way to see the network, instead
of a raw SSH library and a credentials file sitting next to it on disk.
Enrich your terminal
Monitoring and ticketing, attached to the device you are logged into.
The reverse direction works too. RTRGRD's own AI can call external MCP servers you approve
and attach their results as evidence to a question, quoted and treated as untrusted
input.